Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

At a glance: board recommendations and denials, Sept. 3, 2025

Lake Worth Beach Planning and Zoning Board · September 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of Ordinance 2025‑12 (Madison Terrace) and Ordinance 2025‑13 (staff‑revised LDR amendments), and disapproved variance requests for 1708 North Lakeside Drive and 1918 Notre Dame Drive; motions were recorded and the items will proceed to the City Commission or, for variances, remain subject to appeal.

Key formal actions taken by the Lake Worth Beach Planning & Zoning Board on Sept. 3, 2025:

- Ordinance 2025‑12 (Madison Terrace Plan Development Amendment): Board moved to recommend approval with conditions. Motion text on the record: "Recommend approval with conditions of Ordinance 2025‑12... based on the competent and substantial evidence provided in the staff report and in the testimony at the public hearing." The motion passed by voice vote and was reported as unanimous. The recommendation will go to the City Commission for final action.

- Ordinance 2025‑13 (Privately initiated LDR amendments — single destination retail/commercial): Board moved to recommend the staff‑revised LDR amendments with direction on perimeter landscaping flexibility. Motion passed by voice vote and was recorded as unanimous. Item will go to HRPB and City Commission for further review.

- PZB project 25‑01500005 (1708 North Lakeside Drive variance requests): Board moved to disapprove the two variance requests; staff had recommended denial, concluding the variance criteria were not met. The motion passed by voice vote.

- PZP project 25‑001500003 (1918 Notre Dame Drive variance request): Board moved to disapprove the variance to exceed front‑yard impermeable coverage; staff recommended denial because wholesale repaving triggers current pervious surface requirements. Motion passed by voice vote.

Where the transcript records only a voice vote (unanimous/aye), individual roll‑call votes were not provided in the record. Items recommending ordinances will proceed to the City Commission; denied variances may be appealed by applicants.