Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Labor Grievance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Labor counsel: HART should let arbitration proceed on ATU hazard-pay grievance

HART Board of Directors · August 5, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Outside labor counsel David Adams briefed the board on a 2024 ATU grievance seeking time-and-one-half pay tied to pandemic-era work and recommended following the collective-bargaining process; the board voted unanimously to receive the report and allow arbitration to proceed.

Outside labor counsel David Adams told the HART Board the union’s grievance — filed May 2, 2024 — seeks time-and-one-half pay for work between Nov. 1, 2020, and May 11, 2023. Adams said the agency and the union previously agreed to a “40-hour agreement” in 2020 that guaranteed 40 hours’ pay to union members in exchange for waiving hazard pay, and he described that earlier agreement, the $1,500 bonus paid to each union member (a total of about $1,200,000), and the possible legal exposure if an arbitrator awards back pay.

Adams estimated the potential back-pay exposure for time-and-one-half over 2.5 years at about $26,000,000 and recommended the board “follow the collective bargaining agreement and let the process play out.” He told directors the matter is now in the contract’s grievance-and-arbitration pipeline and that the board’s best course is to allow arbitration to proceed.

Board members pressed for clarification about the legal status of the 40-hour arrangement and whether federal COVID-relief funds affected pay decisions. Adams said the 40-hour promise was memorialized in a memorandum of understanding and that the union has acknowledged forfeiting time-and-one-half in exchange for the guaranteed hours and the one-time payments. After discussion, Board Member Myers moved to receive the report and let arbitration proceed; the motion was seconded by Vice Chair Josh Wostel and passed unanimously by roll call.

What happens next: the grievance will continue through arbitration under the collective-bargaining agreement; the board will receive the arbitrator’s report when available.