Get email alerts on the Exam Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee discusses exam timing, ASWB verification fees and alternatives including modular testing
Summary
The committee reviewed ASWB feedback on exam timing, discussed allowing LMSWs to choose which exam to take, and considered exam alternatives (additional supervised hours, modular testing, compact vs. state-specific licenses); it voted to continue exam-alternatives discussion at the next meeting and requested Boost! program data.
The committee noted that the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) provided feedback about exam timing, but the response lacked clarity on whether applicants can be approved to test while still completing supervised experience. Jennifer Lang explained that some state boards allow approval up to six months before completing supervised experience but that this Board does not currently approve applicants mid‑supervision; ASWB can verify eligibility for a fee charged to applicants.
Members discussed whether to allow LMSWs to take either the LMSW or LCSW exam based on practice path, and debated alternatives to a single high-stakes exam such as modular testing or allowing additional supervised hours under experienced supervisors. Sherwood Randolph moved to continue the exam-alternatives discussion at the next meeting; Teresa Reynolds seconded and the motion passed unanimously. Ms. Lang asked staff to review Boost! program data on supervision and exam pass rates to inform the next discussion.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
