Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sign Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison County directs Planning Commission to rework sign rules for county property
Summary
The Board unanimously directed the Planning Commission to continue review of a proposed amendment to Madison County's sign ordinance focused on political signage on County-owned property, following legal guidance that rules must be content-neutral and public comments urging First Amendment protections.
The Madison County Board of Supervisors on July 1 unanimously directed the Planning Commission to continue reviewing proposed changes to the County sign ordinance that would regulate temporary signs on County-owned property. Vice-Chairman James Jewett described his amendment as intended to "address only County property and not private property," and asked the Planning Commission to consider narrow limits on size, height, duration and eligibility during early voting.
County Attorney Hannon Wright advised the board that regulations affecting County-owned property "must remain content-neutral," cautioning that content-based restrictions are difficult to defend legally except for narrow categories such as obscene material. Chairman Carty Yowell asked the Planning Commission to consider Jewett's proposal, the attorney's legal guidance, and written comments submitted by community members.
Public commenters urged care in balancing free-speech rights and local maintenance needs. Clint Hyde asked the Board to "protect First Amendment rights" and urged that any ordinance be "narrowly tailored and legally defensible." Chuck Jackson said some early voters "may not be fully informed about the issues or candidates," urging the Board to consider voter information needs as it drafts rules. Representatives of the Electoral Board provided technical information about election administration and the board discussed inviting a General Registrar representative to the Planning Commission review for technical guidance while avoiding policy advocacy by election officials.
The motion directing the Planning Commission to continue its review passed 5-0 (Yowell, Jewett, Buchanan, Snider, Sharman). The Planning Commission will receive the proposal, the County Attorney's guidance, community submissions (including Clint Hyde's attached draft) and a request to ensure sign-size provisions are consistent across the zoning code.
