Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solid Waste Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council drops pay-as-you-throw, moves to double transfer-station sticker to $104 and invest in enforcement

Lisbon Falls Town Council · May 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilors decided not to adopt pay-as-you-throw this year; instead they approved raising the annual transfer-station sticker from $52 to $104, and set aside funds for a gate/reader to reduce out-of-town use and cheating at the transfer facility.

After extensive discussion of options for managing solid-waste costs, the Lisbon Falls Town Council decided on a two-part approach: postpone pay-as-you-throw implementation and pursue fee-based and capital measures to shore up transfer-station finances. The council agreed in principle to raise the annual transfer-station sticker from $52 to $104, with staff and council committing to explore a senior discount and enforcement improvements.

Councilors and staff repeatedly raised enforcement and leakage as central concerns. A councilor described the prevalence of nonresident or repeat trips: “We have a lot of cheaters… somebody from out of town can borrow their brother's truck… we're not getting paid for it,” a resident warned. Town staff recommended investing roughly $75,000 in automated gate and LisOnBee reader technology to improve tracking and enforcement; staff said that enforcement together with a revised sticker price would materially change the revenue picture if compliance improves.

Staff cautioned about price elasticity and uncertain revenue collection if enforcement is weak. Jim noted the modeling: “If we double the fee, I think you probably might want to look at the annuity ... that's really what we're talking about at this point.” Council members asked staff to produce conservative revenue estimates tied to enforcement scenarios before formal ordinance changes are finalized.