Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Financial Stabilization topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District outlines plan to under-levy, defease debt and borrow for recreation projects; advisors say it could save taxpayers about $15 million in interest

West Allis-West Milwaukee School Board · July 29, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District finance staff and advisors presented a strategy to under-levy the fund-10 operating authority, borrow in fund 38/39 to replace operating dollars and defease portions of a $70 million bond; presenters estimated up to ~$15 million in interest savings and described petition risk, state-aid dependence, and an Aug. 10 timeline for possible board resolutions.

District staff and financial advisors from Baird outlined a multi-step financial-stabilization plan that links funding for recreation projects (the pool and Frank Lloyd Wright commons) with a strategy to under-levy operating authority and defease portions of outstanding bond debt. Presenter Aaron (district finance) said the board could under-levy the full fund-10 portion (illustrated in the presentation at about $41 million) and use a fund-38/fund-39 borrowing to replace those operating dollars so the district can defease portions of the $70 million capital bond; Baird projected taxpayer interest savings "north of $15,000,000" depending on the defeasance amount.

Advisors explained mechanics and trade-offs: an operating (taxable) borrowing would be needed to cover cashflow if the district under-levied, tax-exempt borrowing might pay for the recreation projects placed into fund 39 or fund 80 transfers, and debt-defeasance is effectively a pre-funding of future bond payments via escrow. Presenters used illustrations (e.g., a $45 million defeasance scenario), interest-rate assumptions (an illustrative 5.25% for tax-exempt examples; 6% for taxable operational borrowing), and cautioned that state-aid assumptions and voucher counts could materially affect outcomes. The team also flagged legal and political constraints: an August 10 board resolution window would allow the board to begin the petition period; if a petition obtains sufficient signatures the under-levy/borrowing approach could be forced to a public ballot. Staff recommended committee refinement and DPI communication before finalizing steps.