Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board backs Resource Concepts water-rights transfer amid questions on acre‑feet and basin impacts
Summary
After staff recommended support, the Water District Governing Board voted 4–0 to support Resource Concepts Inc.'s temporary water-rights transfers within Basin 162; staff characterized the transfers as legal water that would move pumpage from the northern part of the basin to a lower‑use southern area to reduce trucking and local decline.
The Nye County Water District Governing Board voted unanimously (4–0) to offer support for Resource Concepts Inc.'s temporary change applications to transfer water within Basin 162, after extended discussion about quantities, consumptive-use effects and long-term implications.
Staff recommended support, saying the transfers move pumping from areas with greater water‑level decline to parts of the basin with less pumpage and that the water is "legal water." "This is all good water," staff said, and added that the transfer is one way to reduce truck traffic and the risks associated with trucking water out of the basin.
On quantities, staff said they did not have a full tally but that "we do know we're talking about more than 1,500 acre feet of water." One board member noted smaller and larger figures reported in backup materials and spoken calculations during the meeting — for example, a calculation referenced as "361.94" acre-feet and another added subtotal reported during discussion (spoken in the meeting as "3300And61Point948"). Board members asked staff to confirm consumptive-use reductions that can occur when water is moved from irrigation to construction and whether division staff would make curtailment determinations for consumptive transfers.
Public commenters and one presenter stressed the trade-offs: moving water south could reduce trucking and localized decline but may also mean southern use for construction of renewable-energy projects. After public comment and additional clarifying questions, a board member moved to support Resource Concepts' request and the motion passed 4–0.
The board directed staff to obtain clarifying information from the Division of Water Resources about consumptive-use adjustments before or as part of any formal comments submitted to the state engineer.
