Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parowan planning commission recommends reclassifying part of 100 North as minor collector

Parowan Planning and Zoning Commission · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a brief public hearing and questions about future annexation access, the Parowan Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council reclassify 100 North between 600 West and 1000 West from a local road to a minor collector.

The Parowan Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council amend the transportation master plan to reclassify a portion of 100 North — from 600 West to 1000 West — from a local road to a minor collector roadway.

The commission opened a public hearing on the proposal and the Chair described the change and the map highlighting the dark yellow segment. During the hearing Councilman Dean asked, “Just looking at that map, will that be one of the main roads that would be coming out from that new annexation, or will their first phase still be running down by the RV resort?” The Chair answered that the applicant’s engineer had produced a preliminary design after the proposed change and that the preliminary design tried to comply with the reclassification, but emphasized the design was preliminary and not final.

No public opposition was recorded during the hearing and the Chair closed public comment at 06:03. Speaker 6 moved to recommend the amendment to the council and Speaker 1 seconded; the Chair called the vote and the ayes carried, with the commission forwarding the recommendation to the City Council.

The recommendation sends the proposed reclassification to the next step in the municipal review process: City Council consideration. The commission’s action was procedural — a recommendation to council rather than a final land-use decision — and any final changes to street design or construction will depend on subsequent engineering plans and council action.