Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezone 2024 018 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Debate over adding gas pumps to Parkside MPD highlights neighborhood safety, school proximity concerns
Summary
Developer representatives asked to change Parkside MPD design guidelines to allow a convenience store canopy with 10 pumps; neighbors and at least one commissioner opposed the pumps citing multiple nearby schools, residential character and traffic. Staff recommended approval with conditions; transcript does not record a final on-the-record tally.
Get email alerts on the Rezone 2024 018 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A developer’s request to change conditions in the Parkside master-plan development (RZSU 2014-4) to allow a convenience store canopy with fuel pumps drew sustained public opposition and commissioner concern at the Aug. 15 meeting.
Chuck Ross (Powell & Edwards), representing the applicant, said the 2014 MPD explicitly allowed a convenience store but prohibited gas pumps, and the applicant seeks a targeted change to allow a canopy with 10 pumps on roughly 6.4 acres of commercial land. Ross said staff recommended approval with three conditions (platting/subdivision, compliance with county fuel regulations, and shared cost for a traffic/roundabout study) and that the applicant would comply with platting and county rules.
Opponents said the site is residential in character and that several gas stations are already within a short distance. Nancy Samuel told commissioners she does not believe another station is necessary and that pumps, lights and traffic would be unacceptable near her house. Gregory McDonald said heavy equipment is already disturbing the back of his property and noted “four schools across the street” from the proposed corner, expressing concern about loitering and traffic near students. Commissioner comments echoed concern about three nearby schools and whether another convenience store with pumps fits the neighborhood character. The transcript records a motion to deny the change-in-conditions but does not include an on-the-record vote tally or recorded disposition; staff previously recommended approval.
