Board votes 3–2 to move forward with athletic‑complex concept after public hearing

The Colman‑Egan School District board voted 3–2 to "move forward" with the proposed athletic complex concept after a public hearing that drew mixed testimony from residents.

Chair opened the motion to consider moving forward and the board approved it on a 3–2 voice vote. The vote followed a public hearing in which supporters emphasized athlete safety and practice access while opponents raised cost, site and process concerns. Scott, the district official presenting the project, summarized survey results showing 56 responses in favor, 30% opposed and 14% undecided and reiterated the district’s analysis of tax impacts related to capital‑outlay limits.

Supporters at the hearing described how a local track would reduce the need for off‑site practice and provide safer spaces for student athletes. Sean Geigley said, “I think it would be a great addition for the athletes here,” and noted his own child had benefited from access to a proper track. Opponents argued the district should wait for pending state legislative changes and questioned the survey process; one resident warned he would collect signatures to force a referendum, saying, “I only need 58 signatures to get this on the ballot. And I promise you I will do that.”

Board members who supported the motion said the next step is to gather more precise cost estimates and site analyses before committing to construction, while members opposed urged broader community outreach and clarified vote mechanisms. No roll‑call of individual board votes is recorded in the transcript; the motion passed on voice vote, 3–2.

The board directed staff to proceed to related predesign and procurement steps (see separate actions on ISG predesign and advertising for a construction manager at risk).