Fayston DRB continues McGann subdivision after neighbors raise trail, driveway and septic concerns

The Fayston Development Review Board on March 4 continued consideration of Application #3927, the proposed McGann Minor Subdivision that would split a 17-acre parcel into a 10.7-acre lot and a 6.9-acre lot, after neighbors raised concerns about trail access, driveway safety and on-site wastewater.

Applicant representative Gunnar McCain described the plan as “a straightforward single lot subdivision” with a proposed mound septic system because of a high water table and boulders. Board members asked to see clearer mapping of building locations relative to slopes and state-designated habitat blocks; Ky Koitzsch said, “We are not seeing enough of the lot in relation to where the building is. I’m interested in seeing the extent of the steep slopes and the state-designated natural areas.”

Neighbors asked detailed questions about public access and safety. Kate Hunt, an adjacent landowner, said, “We are concerned about the safety of the proposed driveway. There would be three driveways, one after the other. I’m not always able to see back to the proposed driveways. Visibility is poor on all three.” Gunnar said the new house driveway will be about 250 feet long and that parking will be provided on-site for the new houses.

Several speakers noted the recreational trail that crosses the property exists by the landowner’s permission. Gunnar said the trail is there “by Dorothy McGann’s permission and she could at any time retract that permission.” Neighbors urged a permanent accommodation — such as an easement or written agreement — to preserve access. Dave Grimason asked whether access could be memorialized; Gunnar said he did not know if Dorothy would be open to granting an easement and noted an easement could reduce the property value.

Board members and the zoning administrator clarified that trail access is a private property matter unless an easement exists or is introduced. The board voted to continue the application and schedule a site visit so members can observe driveway proximity and sightlines after additional thaw. Pete Ludlow moved to continue the application, Jim Donkersloot seconded; the motion carried unanimously. The board tentatively scheduled a site visit for April 1 at 5:00 p.m., before the next meeting; Zoning Administrator Jason Wilson reminded attendees the site visit is for observation only and not a time for testimony.

Next steps: the applicant is expected to provide more detailed mapping of steep slopes, habitat block boundaries, and erosion-control measures before the resumed hearing.