Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Z 7860 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission denies rezoning, land‑use change for proposed Edison Street RV park
Summary
After extensive neighborhood testimony the Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission voted 6–5 to deny rezoning Z‑7860 (to CS) and the companion comprehensive‑plan amendment CPA‑131 to Multiple Use for a ±3.81‑acre site on W. Edison Street. Neighbors cited traffic, lack of plans and maintenance concerns.
The Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission on June 3 denied a rezoning request that would have unified a ±3.81‑acre site east of W. Edison Street and N. 41st West Avenue under Commercial Shopping (CS) zoning and would have paved the way for an RV park application.
Staff introduced Z‑7860 and the related comprehensive‑plan amendment CPA‑131, saying the property is already partially zoned CS and that a Multiple Use land‑designation would be consistent with the parcel's size, historic commercial use along the arterial and proximity to transit. The staff report recommended approval subject to an optional development plan that prohibits several uses and requires screening along yard lines.
Neighbors and adjacent property owners filed lengthy public comments opposed to rezoning. Joan Cmiel Wright said she is "concerned about the traffic on Edison Street, which is very narrow in front of this subject property." JP Laus warned rezoning the residential rear to commercial would "open a Pandora's box" and criticized the lack of feasibility studies and detailed plans. Resident Hunter Jacob told commissioners that demolition crews left debris and downed power lines and said "there are still two abandoned buildings that are not secure, and there are piles of rubble everywhere." Staci Cucuo, a licensed engineer, said she is not opposed to some commercial at the frontage but opposed rezoning the residential rear for an RV park designed for at least 55 RVs without engineering plans.
Applicant Darnell Blackmon acknowledged he has cleared part of the site and said about $50,000 has been spent on clearing; he told commissioners an RV park would typically attract older, traveling retirees and argued the BOA would review a final site plan and conditions if rezoning were granted. "I could place a 150‑unit apartment complex," Blackmon said, arguing that density alone does not justify denial.
After public comment, commissioners debated the competing aims of infill and neighborhood protection. A motion to deny the CS rezoning passed 6–5 (Motion by Commissioner Craddock; Second by Commissioner Fugate). Commissioners recorded the same 6–5 vote to deny CPA‑131, the companion land‑use change to Multiple Use. The motions leave the property under its existing mix of CS and RS‑3 zoning; any future special‑exception application for an RV park would still require a separate BOA review and additional public notices.
The commission's action ends the matter at the TMAPC level for now; any future formal submittal for an RV park would require BOA consideration with a full site plan and permitting details.
