Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Nonprofit Partnerships topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee reviews draft nonprofit partnership agreement to formalize event partners and communications

City of Johns Creek - City Committee (body name not specified in transcript) · August 15, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff proposed a standardized agreement to document and promote nonprofit partners that support Johns Creek events; the committee supported formalizing existing partnerships (Johns Creek Arts Center, Rotary, Public Safety Foundation) while asking staff to add clear criteria and termination safeguards.

Staff introduced a draft nonprofit partnership agreement intended to document existing collaborations with groups that help run special events and to enable those partners to appear in city communications when an agreement exists. "One of the amazing things about Johns Creek... a lot of the needs and programming in the community is actually provided by nonprofits," staff said, explaining the agreement would help nonprofits when applying for grants and would let the city promote partnered events.

Staff said the draft was written with examples (Johns Creek Arts Center, Rotary, Johns Creek Public Safety Foundation) and matched term lengths in existing facility use agreements. Committee members asked about application processes, criteria to avoid favoritism, termination clauses, and whether partners would get promotional benefits such as a logo or waived vendor fees. Staff agreed the next step is to refine criteria and send the draft to legal review before returning to the committee.

Several members supported formalizing partnerships to acknowledge volunteer contributions and help small nonprofits with promotion, while others cautioned that the city should set transparent criteria to avoid appearing to favor some groups over others. Staff said the agreement would include transparency requirements and the city could terminate agreements if partners failed to meet obligations.