Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Environmental Impact topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents tell Amherst board they oppose a 45 MW data center, cite water, power, noise and health risks

Amherst Zoning Board of Appeals · July 29, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dozens of Amherst residents urged the zoning board to deny the variance, raising questions about water use, grid capacity, diesel backup generators, continuous noise and property values. Speakers repeatedly said the presentation lacked enforceable technical data and argued impact studies are needed before a land-use change.

Multiple Amherst residents told the Zoning Board of Appeals they opposed converting the Nordson campus into a large data center and listed environmental and infrastructure concerns they said remained unanswered.

Deborah Pelton told the board that data centers can strain water resources and cited high water-use numbers presented by opponents. Residents repeatedly raised the 45-megawatt figure during public comment and asked where that energy and possible backup generation capacity would come from. "This proposed 45 megawatt data center would reportedly require more electricity than the entire city of Amherst currently uses," said Erin Gonzales, a lifelong Amherst resident. Speakers also raised noise, lighting, property-value and public-health concerns; Dr. Brandon Soltis testified that continuous low-frequency noise and diesel emissions can affect sleep, cardiovascular and respiratory health.

Residents asked for independent, enforceable technical documentation before any land-use change: specific peak and sustained power draw, how much makeup or blowdown water the cooling system would use, the number and fuel type of backup generators and independent noise and lighting measurements. Several speakers urged the board to delay or deny the variance until concrete engineering and environmental proofs exist.