Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Abatement Compliance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council debates compliance finding for American Technology Components; company says it exceeded investment but missed job targets

Elkhart City Common Council · July 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council considered Resolution 26‑R‑39 to determine whether American Technology Components (ATC) substantially complied with its statement of benefits. City staff explained noncompliance would deny benefits for the year but allow the company to return; company CFO said ATC exceeded its investment commitment but did not meet new‑job targets amid a down market.

The council held an extended discussion of Resolution 26‑R‑39 to determine whether American Technology Components (ATC) has made reasonable efforts to comply with its statement of benefits tied to a prior tax abatement.

Mike Huber, Development Services director, explained process and implications: “If you rule noncompliance this evening, the default is that the company will have the ability to come back next year,” and noted that termination of benefits would require explicit council action. Council members pressed for clarity about what noncompliance means for jobs, investments and benefits.

Jordan Hester, CFO of American Technology Components, told the council the company had committed about $13.9 million in investment when it applied but “came in well over 23,000,000,” saying the company achieved roughly 165–167 employees versus an original target that would have included an additional 68 new jobs. Hester also said total wages are about 87% of the promised wage figure and that the RV industry downturn reduced hiring opportunities. Council members asked follow-up questions about the SCA/SDA reporting and job counts; the discussion was ongoing at the end of the recorded transcript and no final council finding or vote on 26‑R‑39 was recorded in the audio.