Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates setbacks, bulk-and-massing and parking numbers for Mountainville Academy STEM plan
Summary
Commissioners and applicants discussed parcel lines, bulk-and-massing calculations and parking counts for Mountainville Academy's proposed STEM center; staff said the project would need exceptions unless parcels are consolidated, while applicants said the design was chosen to minimize walking distances and retain green space.
A large portion of the Sept. 2 meeting focused on technical code issues: setbacks, bulk-and-massing calculations, parking counts and possible parcel consolidation for the Mountainville Academy STEM building.
Staff explained the code's purpose: bulk-and-massing limits are intended to avoid overbuilding a single lot and to preserve neighborhood scale. The proposed STEM building crosses existing parcel lines and therefore would require exceptions to side-yard setback rules (40-foot side-yard standard) unless the school consolidates the three parcels into one legal lot. Commission members indicated that combining lots would remove one need for an exception and made approval more likely.
Applicants and staff discussed parking math in detail. The school currently has about 100 permanent parking stalls on-site; the schematic would add parking to reach approximately 159 permanent stalls. Staff noted the city's bright-line guideline at about 165 stalls (figures are from the application packet and the applicants' calculations). Applicants acknowledged the plan would fall a few stalls short of the guideline but said the design increases queuing length and event parking options on either the school or adjacent city property.
Commissioners also discussed the implications of modular classrooms, the permanent nature of the new STEM building, pre-K enrollment (reported at 60 and not part of the 750 charter cap) and how future changes in the charter's permitted capacity could affect long-term traffic and parking needs. Several commissioners said they were more open to an exception for massing if the board agreed to consolidate lots and provide stronger commitments on parking, circulation and mitigation.
