Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board weighs procurement approach after legal advice; drain commissioner may resign to avoid conflict
Summary
After legal review, commissioners discussed procurement options for lake control projects and the potential conflict of interest posed by an elected drain commissioner who also performs lake management work; resignation and reassignment of duties were mentioned as options to avoid legal gray areas.
Commissioners discussed legal guidance about procurement and a possible conflict if the elected drain commissioner (who also performs lake‑management duties) bids on lake control projects. The board noted a "gray area" in allowing an elected official's office to bid on county projects and outlined options including having the drain commissioner resign before bidding or transferring lake‑manager bidding authority to the Soil Erosion office or another delegate.
Commissioners emphasized the need for written notice if a resignation occurs and discussed typical bidding processes for large water‑control projects: engineer‑led design, public bid posting statewide, and engineering oversight during construction with day‑rate inspection or built‑in contract oversight. Board members leaned toward open bidding (web posting) and advised retaining an engineering firm to oversee construction and change orders so the county's liability is managed.
The board directed staff and counsel to draft a standardized bidding outline for use across lakes and requested the outline be returned to the board for approval before bidding begins.
