Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Micromobility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council leaves multiple e-bike and e-scooter rules on readings after public comment
Summary
Council left a suite of micromobility ordinances on second reading—covering sidewalk speed, helmets for under-18s, traffic-code applicability, and safety rules—after public comment urging class-based rules and local consistency; a Committee of the Whole is scheduled before the next meeting.
Get email alerts on the Micromobility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members left several micromobility ordinances on second reading for further consideration, including proposals to prohibit sidewalk bicycle operation at speeds greater than pedestrians when pedestrians are near (Ord. 2026-26), require helmets for operators or riders under 18 (Ord. 2026-27), ensure the traffic code applies to bicycles and electric bicycles (Ord. 2026-28), and add additional safety regulations for low-speed micromobility devices and electric personal assistive mobility devices (Ords. 2026-30 and 2026-31). Another ordinance would explicitly include electric scooters in the low-speed micromobility definition (Ord. 2026-29).
A member of the public, Scott Savage of South Franklin Street, urged the council to adopt a class-based approach used elsewhere: "the prevailing approach elsewhere is to regulate by class: Class 1 pedal-assist bikes are generally permitted on sidewalks and trails, while Class 2 and Class 3 bikes — particularly throttle-operated models — are typically prohibited," he said. Savage also noted Chagrin Falls' narrow, uneven streets often make sidewalk riding necessary and suggested the forthcoming South Franklin Street trail could help. Council offered to hold a Committee of the Whole meeting before June 22 to give the micromobility legislation more time for discussion.
