Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Lot Consolidation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission recommends final approval for Scherf lot consolidation with conditions

Salem Township Planning Commission · August 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission recommended final approval to consolidate two Westmoreland County parcels for a single-family home, subject to revisions to the Statement of Purpose, setback modification request, certification text edits, utility tap verifications, and a revision date on the plan.

The Salem Township Planning Commission on August 6 recommended final approval of a lot consolidation that would combine Westmoreland County tax parcels 57-17-03-0-003 and 57-17-03-0-004 to enable construction of a single-family house.

Applicant Hunter Scherf told the commission “we are looking to consolidate for the purpose of constructing a house.” The commission required several plan revisions before final recording: revise the Statement of Purpose to read that the parcels are being consolidated for a single-family home; submit a written modification request to the Board of Supervisors for an exemption from the minimum 30-foot front building setback under the Salem Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance (SALDO) §412(A) and, if granted, include the approved setback note on the plan; amend Township and Westmoreland County certification language per SALDO §502(H)(22); correct the abutting owner’s surname to “Roncace”; obtain FTMSA verification of sewage tap capacity and MAWC verification of water tap availability; and add a plan revision number and date.

Commissioner Connie Mattei and Solicitor Gary Falatovich clarified that FTMSA certifies capacity, not the tap itself, and that a planning module requirement depends on whether a new on-lot system is being created. Following discussion, Paul Holleran moved and John Durco seconded a recommendation for final approval subject to the listed conditions; the motion passed unanimously.