Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Improvements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends Dinwiddie County 10-year Capital Improvements Plan to supervisors
Summary
The commission reviewed the FY2027'FY2036 Capital Improvements Plan, discussed project-ranking criteria and financing options, and voted 6'0 to recommend the plan to the Board of Supervisors for approval, focusing initially on FY27 funding for urgent projects.
The Dinwiddie County Planning Commission voted to recommend the county's FY2027'FY2036 Capital Improvements Plan to the Board of Supervisors after a staff presentation and follow-up questions. Chair (speaker 2) called for a motion, and the commission recorded six members voting aye.
County staff presenter Massengill (speaker 6) told the commission the CIP ties to the county's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and described a working group that evaluates and ranks projects using criteria such as preserving county assets, reducing liability (including ADA compliance), and leveraging state or federal matching funds. "If everything's a priority, nothing's a priority," Massengill said, explaining departmental prioritization requirements.
Massengill highlighted the plan's 10-year scope and the FY27 focus: the total 10-year estimated project cost is about $189,000,000, and the county models urgent-year funding (FY27'FY31) separately. He said the county maintains a replacement fund ("fund 307") and estimated that roughly five pennies on the tax rate equates to about $1,870,000 annually to address systematic replacements. Massengill said Davenport & Company modeled borrowing scenarios and that, as presented for the courthouse project, there were "no tax implications to the public."
Commissioners asked whether the county could borrow for both the courthouse and a planned middle-school renovation in a single financing package to take advantage of matching grant timelines; staff said that was being modeled but cautioned that the Board of Supervisors recently set the tax rate and any borrowing that would require a different tax structure could not proceed without further action. The commission made a formal motion to forward the CIP to the Board of Supervisors; the motion passed with six members voting aye.
The planning commission will provide finalized copies of the CIP to commissioners and the item will proceed to the Board of Supervisors for a public hearing and final action.
