Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Courts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judge requests security and equipment upgrades; motion to reinstate probation officer fails
Summary
Judge Brian Bade asked the council to approve contracts and transfers for an external magnetic door lock (~$21,863.23) and replacement recording equipment ($3,346.75), and requested reinstating a third probation officer for the rest of 2025; the probation officer motion failed on a 2–4 vote.
Get email alerts on the Courts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judge Brian Bade told the council the Circuit Court is exploring three operational changes and one personnel request. He said the court is looking into hiring a drug-screening service where clients would pay providers directly. Bade also indicated he would request a June transfer of approximately $21,863.23 to purchase an external magnetic door lock to allow remote locking and unlocking of a courthouse door, and a separate June transfer of $3,346.75 to replace Circuit Court recording equipment.
Bade requested reinstating a third probation officer for the remainder of 2025 but said he would not seek funding for that position in 2026 or 2027. A motion by Jim Weiseman, seconded by Fred Tobey, to reinstate the position failed on a 2–4 vote. Judge Bade asked the council to consult their attorney about the decision, stating, "It is unconstitutional," and said he would return to the council in June with additional information.
The council did not record roll-call votes by name for the probation-officer motion in the minutes; the minutes record only the tally.
