Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenter urges Cole County to cite lawful authority and published standards for road and trust actions
Summary
A presenter asked the Cole County Commission to identify the lawful authority and published standards governing decisions that affect property rights, citing examples including Atelier Drive, differing trust documents, and county pavement management 'chip seal' practices.
Get email alerts on the Government Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A presenter addressed the Cole County Commission on July 28, urging the county to make explicit the lawful authority and published standards that guide government decisions affecting property rights and pavement management. The speaker said the public and property owners need clear, inspectable standards to rely on when government actions affect recorded plats or building rights.
The presenter told commissioners they should be able to point to both the statutory authority and the specific published standard supporting any discretionary action. "What lawful authority authorized placing the restriction... and what published standard guided the exercise of that authority?" the presenter asked. He submitted multiple exhibits, citing Cole County's 1999 land subdivision rules and specific examples including Atelier Drive and differing trust documents the county produced in response to a Sunshine request.
The presenter described technical methods that, he said, would constitute objective evaluation for pavement decisions — "core samples, falling wave deflectometer, dynamic cone penetrometer, crack mapping, ride quality index" — and requested the commission require that legal advice identify the precise constitutional, statutory, regulatory, or other lawful authority for actions affecting property. The presentation concluded with a request that governing documents be formally identified in the public record rather than replaced by unwritten practice.
The commission did not announce an immediate formal response during the presentation; the item entered the record and the presenter left exhibits for the commission and public to review.
