Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enforcement Evidence topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Solicitor: resident recordings can help prove noise violations but witnesses may still need to testify
Summary
A resident asked whether recorded video/audio of noise can be used as evidence when officers arrive later; the township solicitor said recordings with date/time stamps and corroboration by separate residents can provide prima facie evidence, but complainants may still be required to appear in court.
Pat Dollerton asked whether recordings of noise incidents are useful if officers arrive after the noise has stopped and the recorded activity is no longer occurring.
Township solicitor John Waco said recordings with clear date and time information are useful and that if two or more residents in separate residences corroborate the times and durations of a noise disturbance, that can establish prima facie evidence that a violation occurred. He cautioned that, from a practical perspective, officers and prosecutors prefer in-person testimony and evidence, and witnesses may still be expected to appear in court.
Waco recommended residents call 911 while the noise is occurring so officers can be dispatched to observe violations in real time; recordings are a helpful supplement but are generally stronger when combined with officer observation or multiple witnesses.
