Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Automated Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ruston outlines traffic-camera rollout, court setup and new ALPR limits

City of Ruston City Council · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Chief Bautista briefed council on the NovoaGlobal traffic-camera contract, selection of Mary Joyce Community Center as a hearing venue, interim court-clerk staffing, and new state restrictions on ALPR use and required reporting; staff said camera data retention is limited to 21 days.

City staff described early administrative steps for a planned automated traffic-camera program and warned of new state restrictions on license-plate readers. Chief of Police Nestor Bautista told the council that NovoaGlobal holds the site contract for the traffic-camera project and that the city must establish an administrative hearing process — including selection of a hearing venue, an appointed hearing examiner and a court clerk to handle citations. The council was told the Mary Joyce Community Center has been selected as the venue and that a police officer will serve temporarily as court clerk while the city seeks a hearing examiner (the prosecutor’s office would be a conflict of interest).

Bautista said the program requires a complicated administrative backend for court and accounting systems, and he emphasized accessibility requirements: the ticketing process must be ADA compliant so that people with disabilities can contest tickets virtually. He also reported that recent state legislation curtails automated license-plate-reader (ALPR) use—limiting their role in many misdemeanor investigations—and places monthly reporting and record-keeping obligations on the department. Staff clarified that camera-derived data can only be retained for 21 days under the current plan.

Councilmembers discussed fiscal offsets: Jensen asked whether revenue from the cameras could cover traffic-court administrative costs and received confirmation that revenues dedicated to public safety would reduce general-fund spending on public safety. Hedrick asked about data-retention timelines and was told 21 days.