Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Conservation Prioritization topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tamworth committee advances co-occurrence mapping framework to set conservation priorities

Conservation Land Review Committee (subcommittee of Tamworth & Sandwich Conservation Commissions) · May 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Conservation Land Review Committee continued work May 19 on a co-occurrence mapping and scoring system to prioritize conservation parcels in Tamworth and Sandwich, agreeing to refine six major categories, test weighting against NH WAP scores, and apply the framework to sample properties.

The Conservation Land Review Committee met May 19 and focused its agenda on building a co-occurrence mapping and scoring framework to help set conservation priorities across Tamworth and Sandwich. Chair Ned Beecher summarized a proposed flow that would produce a 4–10 page assessment for candidate properties integrating multiple categories and data layers; the committee agreed that landowners retain final authority over decisions about their land and that Tamworth policy requires public access with short-term exceptions for agriculture and forestry.

The group reviewed a three-page document Dwight Emery prepared that consolidates categories from several local and regional planning sources (UVSLT, LRCT Delphi, TCC 2007, SPNHF) and discussed next steps: refining six core categories and a second tier of subcategories, determining which mapping data layers exist for each subcategory, and testing the system on two Tamworth properties and one in Sandwich. Dwight was assigned to update the spreadsheet in a shared Google Doc for collaborative edits. The committee planned to balance NH WAP condition scores with their own scoring, with one suggested weighting being roughly one-third WAP and two-thirds the committee's matrix.