Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Officials say contract cannot override compact rules as drought and curtailment concerns surface
Summary
Committee members raised concerns that new bureau operations or an ongoing EIS could trigger curtailments that a local contract can't prevent; presenters said the compact and ‘law of the river’ will govern operations and that contractual language cannot supersede law.
A commissioner (S4) raised concern that forthcoming environmental reviews or bureau operational changes could produce curtailments the contract cannot prevent, citing recent policy work on reservoir operations. The presenter (S2) responded that "the compact and the law of the river" will govern and that a local contract cannot override those statutory and interstate obligations.
An attorney present (S3) described tension among basin states and cautioned that inter-state decisions can produce difficult outcomes for upstream operators, while commissioners noted there is limited protection the contract can afford against broader compact-driven actions. The group agreed the contract should preserve the status quo of operations where possible but recognized limits imposed by federal rules, compact agreements and basin-level decisions.
No contractual changes were proposed to alter legal obligations; participants asked staff to ensure the contract language explicitly acknowledges existing compacts and legal constraints.
