Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bridges topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Official inspection finds Milbank Avenue bridge in poor condition; hydraulic study recommended for replacement planning
Summary
Banner Associates reported both Milbank Avenue and Eastman Avenue bridges are roughly 40 years old; Milbank Avenue rated level 3 (poor). The firm recommended load limits, temporary safety measures and a hydraulic study to support future replacement; grant funding may cover the study.
Get email alerts on the Bridges topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
An engineering presentation to the Milbank City Council found two downtown bridges showing age-related deterioration and recommended steps toward eventual replacement.
Mark Junker of Banner Associates told the council both bridges are about 40 years old (the typical service life is about 50 years). He classified the Milbank Avenue bridge as level 3 (poor) with corrosion and underside failure but no immediate danger; he recommended imposing load limits, placing orange safety drums or repairing a pile on the south railing, and fixing asphalt at the west roadway approach. The Eastman Avenue bridge was rated level 4 (fair) with similar deterioration compared with the previous inspection two years ago; recommendations included load limits, tightening railing connections and patching metal back wall sheeting.
Junker said both bridges will likely need replacement soon and recommended a hydraulic study as the first step; he noted grants are available to help pay for the study but construction grants are more competitive. Council did not set a replacement timetable but acknowledged the need for a study and early planning.
