Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Sidewalks topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident questions sidewalk notices; council approves special assessments ordinance 1-45-26 after lengthy debate

Lima City Council · July 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A resident told council her sidewalk was cited as 0.0625" out of compliance and estimated repair at $471.08; Council debated notification, contractor availability and fairness before passing Ordinance 1-45-26 (special assessments for 2025 combined sidewalk project) 6–1 on first reading.

Tracy Conkelman told Lima City Council she received an undated certified notice demanding 30 square feet of sidewalk replaced by Sept. 1 and said her sidewalk measured "0.0625 of an inch" out of compliance despite no visible cracking. She said city staff had not shown her where the measurement was taken and that finding a contractor to replace a single panel is difficult; she requested clearer, consistent notification and extension options.

"The process needs to be standard, consistent, accurate, and professional for all people," Conkelman said. Council debate focused on equity and procedure: Councilor Lowe and others said the program can look like a "money grab" if notices appear uneven across neighborhoods; public works staff explained there is a rotation-based prioritization, that many notices in the 900 block totaled 17 properties of 67 notifications, and that accessibility thresholds (about 1 inch differential) drive some decisions.

Public works (Harpster) told council the program permits residents to hire a contractor before city work, that assessments may be spread over five years if the city performs the work, and that the city gives extension options. Councilor Lowe urged the administration to "take care of home first" and ensure consistent communications. After discussion the council voted to pass Ordinance 1-45-26 on its first reading by a 6–1 vote (Lowe opposed).