Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Outer Loop topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve revised MOU to engage RTC on southern outer loop, 4–1
Summary
After extended debate over local control, engineering judgment and commitments for State Highway 205, the Rockwall County Commissioners Court approved a revised memorandum of understanding with the Regional Transportation Council covering the proposed southern outer loop, adding recitals and directing preferential consideration for a locally proposed route.
The Rockwall County Commissioners Court voted 4–1 April 28 to approve a revised memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) on the proposed southern portion of the county's outer loop.
Commissioner Lickdy, who introduced the document and the court's proposed edits, said the changes were intended to make the county's expectations explicit. "We need to get to a point where we can finish this today," Lickdy said during a lengthy discussion of recitals and design objectives. The approved revisions add language recognizing that both parties previously agreed to split the outer loop into two portions and ask the RTC to expedite work on State Highway 205, including a proposed John King swap where appropriate.
Commissioner Stacy pushed for clarity that locally proposed routes receive preferential consideration: "If we're going to spend local dollars to do this study, the goal is for this body to endorse a route," Stacy said, adding that the county should expect that endorsement to be treated seriously by regional partners.
John Polster, who participated in negotiations with the RTC, told the court that the MOU is primarily a framework for the environmental and design work ahead. "Whatever we do on this, I'm going to encourage us strongly when we write the purpose and need for the document that we put all these things in the purpose and need because then it's a requirement to comply with," Polster said.
Opponents and skeptics raised concerns about open-ended language and who would ultimately decide whether a locally preferred route materially reduces mobility benefits. The motion, as amended to stop a key clause at "proposed by the county" and to add recitals urging RTC support of 205, passed 4–1.
Next steps: staff and the county's consultants will incorporate the court's edits into the MOU circulated to RTC staff and continue coordination with TxDOT and RTC engineering staff as the environmental and alignment work proceeds.
