Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Contributions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners review employee contribution scenarios to limit county cost
Summary
Staff presented three contribution illustrations showing different employer/employee splits; raising employee contributions could reduce net county cost by several hundred thousand dollars depending on migration and plan design.
Get email alerts on the Employee Contributions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff presented multiple employee contribution illustrations that change how much of the renewal cost the county pays directly versus passes to employees.
Nick walked through three benchmarked illustrations (pages 11–13 of the packet). In one "maximum contribution" grandfathered scenario he showed an employee‑only increase that would translate to a roughly $12 per month increase for an employee‑only plan in one benchmark and family contribution examples for the $500 and $1,500 deductible options. In another illustration he said an employee‑only contribution of $67 and family of $538 (for eight months of the budget year) was one modeled renewal outcome; different contribution mixes produced net county savings in the hundreds of thousands of dollars in the illustrations.
Presenters repeatedly cautioned that net savings depend on how employees migrate between plan options and that migration is difficult to predict. Commissioners confirmed they can set employee contributions and requested additional scenarios in between the presented options to find a budgetary compromise.
