Get email alerts on the Multi Family Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board grants variance for Chester Road Partners' 121-unit proposal; 45 units below standard size
Summary
The Avon board approved a 45-unit variance allowing 121 units with many units slightly under the 1,400 sq. ft. requirement; the 3–2 vote reflected concerns about unit sizes and city planning goals for senior housing under an R3 moratorium.
Get email alerts on the Multi Family Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Avon Board of Zoning and Building Appeals approved, by a 3–2 vote on Jan. 7, a variance allowing 45 units to be built below the 1,400-square-foot dwelling-unit area requirement for a 121-unit multi-family Phase 1 development proposed by Chester Road Partners (Petros Homes).
Greg Modic of Petros Homes presented the variance request. Pam Fechter, the city's planning coordinator, provided a detailed breakdown showing many units were only slightly under the standard: 32 “Cornell” units were roughly 100 sq. ft. below the requirement, and the Dartmouth units were about 73 sq. ft. smaller. Fechter said the developer is offering one-bedroom units at 880 sq. ft. (above the 800 sq. ft. minimum for one-bedroom units), and noted the administration permits a 10% variation in unit size so long as units do not drop to efficiency sizes near 600 sq. ft. Fechter also reminded the board that City Council passed ordinance 120-25 imposing a one-year moratorium on new R3 (multi-family residential) development to allow code revisions and to better address local housing objectives, including senior housing. The motion to approve carried on a 3–2 roll call: Bulger yes; Hricovec no; Miller yes; Schatschneider no; Ladegaard yes.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
