Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Prosecuting attorney seeks window upgrades but grant funds may not apply
Summary
Prosecuting Attorney Michael Parker reported first-floor windows in his building need locks and upgraded tint; he noted the CSF grant will not cover expenses because the building does not contain a courtroom and was not included in the 2025 Court Security Audit.
Prosecuting Attorney Michael Parker told the meeting that windows on the first level of his building need upgrades and locks because current tinting allows visibility at night. He said the building is not a courtroom building, so the Courthouse Security Fund (CSF) grant will not cover those expenses.
Meeting notes indicated the 2025 Court Security Audit by Arthur Angus did not include Parker’s building and that Family Law Court also had windows without locks cited in the audit. Parker asked for guidance on non‑CSF funding options and for confirmation of who is responsible for maintaining security features on that building. The meeting did not record a procurement decision or identified funding source for the window upgrades.
