Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commercial Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Prospective storage facility seeks clarity on setbacks, windows and impact fees
Summary
An entrepreneur proposing a commercial storage site in the business zone sought guidance on screening, lot frontage, window/opening rules, and whether impact fees must be paid before future utility hookups; staff explained frontage rules, accessory-building fire-rating requirements and ERU/impact-fee timing.
A prospective owner seeking to build a commercial storage facility in the business zone asked the planning commission detailed questions about zoning, screening, building placement and future utility connections. The applicant cited code language requiring that "all commercial storage and warehousing facilities shall be enclosed by a fence or a wall… and screening system that provides adequate security and is architecturally compatible with the consolidated business and district neighborhood," and asked how that applied to their plans. Planning staff confirmed the screening requirement and walked through lot frontage and yard rules, noting a minimum 35-foot frontage requirement for business-zone parcels.
The applicant also asked whether they must install electricity, water or sewer at construction or could defer connections and impact fees until later. Planning staff and the planning engineer explained that permits must reflect the intended use and that impact fees are typically charged when a property connects to city services (often included with the building permit). The planning engineer cautioned that Rocky Mountain Power requires load sheets and inspections for electrical service changes, and staff warned that water ERU availability is limited: "we only have 26 ERUs available at this area;" applicants were urged to confirm current ERU inventory and plan infrastructure sizing before committing to engineering fees.
Staff reviewed accessory-building rules, including a 4-hour fire-rating requirement for walls on a property line and clarified the difference between accessory structures and main buildings when it comes to openings and projections. The group advised the applicant to return with engineered, to-scale drawings showing property lines, utilities and door locations so the city and county can sign for county-level building review.
