Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Green River Affordable Project topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Green River Partners' proposed 25–30 unit affordable rental project tabled after 264-signature petition

Emery County Community Reinvestment Agency · April 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Green River Partners asked the Emery County CRA for a $151,000 five‑year loan to support a 25–30 unit rental project targeting 25–50% AMI; after residents presented a 264-signature petition opposing the project and commissioners said they lacked a lending policy and city support, the board voted to table the request pending a formal policy and clearer city position.

Bill Knowlton of Green River Partners told the CRA he intends to build a 25–30 unit affordable rental project in Green River, financed in part with federal low-income housing tax credits, and asked the agency for a $151,000 five-year loan the company says would make its Utah Housing Corporation application more competitive.

"Our proposal today is asking for $151,000 loan for five years at below interest that will be paid back," Knowlton said, describing a capital stack he estimated would total about $10.5–12 million for the project and rents calibrated to AMI tiers. Residents and a city council member reported a 264-signature petition opposing the project, arguing Green River does not need 25–30 low-income units and raising concerns about EMS and school impacts. One resident on the record, Guy Webster, said the petition represented broad local opposition.

Commissioners debated policy and local support; several said the CRA needs a formal application policy and that projects affecting city limits should show affirmative city backing. A motion to table the loan request until the CRA has a lending/distribution policy and to allow further vetting of community concerns passed on a majority vote (motion moved and seconded; recorded votes: two commissioners yes, one opposed). The CRA directed staff and UAC to draft a policy and hold a near-term work session to resolve application criteria and city support requirements before taking money-related actions on the project.