Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Staffing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses creating an economic development director role; details and funding still unsettled
Summary
Board members confirmed funds have been earmarked for an economic development director but debated whether the role should be a county employee or contractor; members urged hiring someone who can actively pursue projects and manage relationships with utilities and cities.
Jordan Leonard told the board that the county commission will be discussing an economic development director role at an upcoming session and that there may already be money in this year’s budget to support the role.
Board members emphasized the need for a dynamic hire who can follow up on RFIs/RFQs, cultivate relationships with cities and utilities, and be present in the county offices rather than an occasional contractor. Several members said they prefer a county employee for continuity and control; others noted procurement and budget questions must be resolved by the commission. The board agreed to encourage the commission to explore options and to provide support and input during the recruitment and scope-development process.
Next steps: Board members indicated they would be available to help define the job scope and to participate in meetings with commissioners and staff as needed.
