Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sign Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners weigh portable‑sign rules and lighting limits in portal sign code update
Summary
Staff presented changes to the portal sign code to allow A‑frames and certain entry signs for businesses not adjacent to the street; commissioners asked for clearer placement language, confirmation that A‑frames won’t count toward sign‑area allocations, and said any illumination should be white only.
Get email alerts on the Sign Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff reviewed proposed edits to the portal (portable) sign code that would allow portable signs on public or private streets that provide primary vehicular access to a parcel and include a 12‑foot placement dimension for some sign types. "So allowing them to have it as an entry into that parcel, kinda makes sense to me," Planning staff (S2) said when describing signs for businesses without direct street frontage.
Commissioners raised practical concerns about visibility during winter darkness and about code text. Commissioner (S3) asked that the draft clarify number 7 and argued that temporary A‑frame signs are ineffective after 4:30 p.m. in winter; "I just would like to see number 7 clarify more and and allowing them to eliminate those signs because they're no good after 04:30 in the winter," Commissioner (S3) said. Several commissioners said lighting should be limited to white only: "Only white. White light. No color," Commissioner (S3) said.
Staff agreed to review the wording tying the 12‑foot provision to the appropriate clause and to confirm whether temporary A‑frames should be excluded from the 5% permanent sign‑area allocation. The commission did not adopt any final language at the meeting; staff will redraft and return with clarified text.
