Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State preemption bill advances after Sweetwater city attorney warns of public‑safety risks
Summary
Leader Cochran's bill saying the state should set hunting rules statewide advanced after lengthy testimony from John Cleal, Sweetwater's city attorney, who said municipal authority to regulate firearm discharge is needed to protect residents. The committee voted 8–1 to send the bill to the full committee.
Leader Cochran sponsored HB 20-17 to reaffirm that the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA) and state law, rather than municipal ordinances, should govern the manner and means of taking wildlife. The sponsor said a recent court case in Sweetwater, Monroe County, showed a need to clarify state law; he characterized the bill as aligning statutory code with long‑standing state practice and TWRA authority.
John Cleal, city attorney for Sweetwater, testified in opposition. Cleal described a local incident in which shotgun fire at roughly 7 a.m. from a pond adjacent to subdivisions and a high school parking lot sent shot onto a house roof and generated substantial noise complaints. "This is not a hunting issue. This is a public safety issue," Cleal told the committee, and he said the case is currently pending before the Court of Appeals. Cleal said the parcel where the hunters fired was about 17 acres and zoned agricultural, but that the proximity to homes, a high school (about 159 feet away), subdivisions (about 340–500 feet), and businesses (roughly 550–600 feet) made the situation dangerous.
Several members pushed on scope and local control. Representative Jones and others warned the bill would strip cities that currently regulate firearm discharge of a tool they use to protect neighborhoods; Representative Jones noted roughly 180 Tennessee cities could be affected. Leader Cochran said TWRA is the appropriate statewide regulator and that statutory clarity is the bill's purpose. The committee voted to move HB 20-17 to the full committee, recorded as 8 ayes and 1 nay. The bill will now proceed to the next committee stage for additional consideration.
