Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Shoreland Pier 419 River topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Eliot planning board defers decision on 128-foot pier at 419 River Road after resident opposition
Summary
The Eliot Planning Board delayed action on a shoreland permit for a proposed 128-foot pier at 419 River Road after extensive public comment citing mudflats, navigation safety, wildlife and neighborhood character; the board scheduled a site walk for May 11 and continued review.
The Eliot Planning Board on April 21 deferred a decision on a Shoreland Zoning Permit for 419 River Road (PB26-04), after multiple abutters and long-time residents urged denial of a proposal to build a 60-foot fixed pier, 40-foot gangway and two 14-foot floats (128 feet total). Paul Shiner, vice chair of the Planning Board, opened the continued public hearing and said the Board would consider new materials and public testimony before taking action.
Neighbors told the Board the cove is a mudflat much of the tide cycle and argued a longer pier would not substantially improve navigability while altering the character of the shoreline and impeding small-craft recreation. “The proposed pier, gangway, and float constitute both a private and public nuisance because its excessive length unreasonably interferes with neighboring waterfront usage and public navigation,” said Meaghan Durocher, a long-time resident. Several speakers also raised concerns about spring ice and debris, impacts to horseshoe-crab foraging habitat, potential vibration impacts during pile installation and loss of view corridors toward the General Sullivan Bridge.
Agent Ken Wood of Attar Engineering told the Board the design used a recent property survey to locate riparian lines and that the proposal meets town shoreland ordinance criteria. “With the new pier, he will increase [usable water] by about three hours,” Wood said, describing tidal behavior at the site and explaining piles would be vibrated (not impact-driven) into the riverbed. Applicant Anthony Warren said he measured water depths at low tide and expects roughly 16–18 inches of additional depth at the float at certain tides and that the plan was intended to balance utility with neighbor concerns.
Board members said they had received late materials and needed time to compare neighboring dock lengths, verify riparian-line mapping and, if helpful, inspect the site. Carmela Braun and Suzanne O'Connor both recommended deferral to allow more information; O'Connor moved and Braun seconded to defer. The motion passed 5–0. The Board set a site walk for May 11 and continued the hearing to May 19 (the Board later noted a June 2 continuation on May 19).
