Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation Ludine topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council advances Ludine/Haskell annexation petition for review despite resident opposition
Summary
A Ludine (Mark and Marjorie Haskell) annexation petition covering roughly 6.57 acres was advanced for staff review. Planning staff flagged right-of-way, drainage and lot-size concerns; the council majority voted to review, with several members saying they opposed the concept plan.
Get email alerts on the Annexation Ludine topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council voted to advance the Ludine (Mark and Marjorie Haskell) annexation petition for staff analysis rather than take any annexation action tonight. Planning staff showed a concept layout and flagged multiple issues: proximity to a proposed future arterial (1500 East), the need to preserve wide right-of-way for a future arterial (about 108'118 feet back-to-back), drainage concerns raised by submitted public comments, and recommendations that zoning should likely be R1-10 or R1-15 rather than R1-9 to better match adjacent lot sizes (planning presentation and public comments, SEG 4096'1443).
Public commenters and some council members asked staff to limit unnecessary staff hours on applications that may not be timely. Council ultimately voted to advance the petition for review so staff can evaluate right-of-way dedication, stormwater/drainage mitigation and lot-size compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods; staff will return with findings and recommended conditions if appropriate (motion and vote for review, SEG 4212'4235).

