Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Gateway Peaks Subdivision topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Neighbors press Parowan planners over drainage and ATV traffic at Gateway Peaks hearing

Parowan Planning and Zoning Commission · June 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents at the public hearing on the Gateway Peaks Phase 1 subdivision pressed staff on drainage, road alignment, and a rise in ATV/side-by-side traffic along 200 North; staff said Phase 1 avoids a direct 200 North connection and that drainage and required paths are addressed in the annexation agreement.

At a June 3 public hearing on the preliminary Gateway Peaks (Phase 1) subdivision, nearby residents urged the Parowan Planning and Zoning Commission to address long-standing drainage problems and a recent surge in off-road vehicles along 200 North.

Shelly Roy, who spoke during public comment, said the area has become a "massive, massive influx of side by sides, dirt bikes" and warned the subdivision will "only get worse if something's not prevented now". She asked whether Phase 1 would connect to 200 North and pressed staff on the width and location of the walking path.

Staff presenter Dan (S3) answered that Phase 1 would not connect directly to 200 North and that the annexation agreement requires an asphalt path in one location and a 5-foot gravel walking path in another. He said the developer "has complied" with the annexation agreement and noted, "they have deeded more water to the city than they need for phase 1" in order to bank rights for later phases.

Tim Roy (S7) expanded on drainage concerns, describing efforts to widen a ditch on his property and saying heavy rains already cause deep flows: "I'm gonna get flooded because we're going to extend that road 5 feet on my side." City staff and the city engineer (Dallas, S8) explained that the current plan places improvements within the existing right-of-way and that some property strips on the north side are not yet dedicated, which constrains where the city can locate a new trail or widen the roadway.

Staff said drainage through the area is an existing city responsibility and will need engineered fixes as the development proceeds. Dan told residents the city will coordinate grading, cross-gutters and culverts as part of engineering: "We need to engineer the flow line of that and make sure that ditch actually just carries water."

The public hearing closed after the exchange and the commission later moved forward with the related road-dedication item.