Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances change to construction statute of repose after brief debate
Summary
House Bill 734, aimed at clarifying how additional necessary parties can be joined after an otherwise‑timely construction‑defect filing under a 4‑year statute of repose, was advanced to counter and rules following questions about late‑discovered defects.
Lawmakers advanced House Bill 734 after a short explanation and member questions about how the measure would apply to defects discovered after the statutory period.
The sponsor described the bill as preserving Tennessee's four‑year statute of repose in construction defect cases while allowing an additional necessary party to be brought into a case if the initial lawsuit was filed within the four‑year period. "The US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2024 case has held that 4 years means 4 years," the sponsor told the committee, and the bill would permit a late‑added necessary party under certain circumstances.
Representative Johnson asked whether latent defects — for example problems with a foundation discovered years later — would be covered; the sponsor said in his understanding the four‑year period remains firm and late discovery would not extend it. The committee voted to send the amended bill to counter and rules; the clerk reported 13 ayes and 3 nos.
The committee did not amend the bill's core repose timeframe during the hearing; questions centered on statutory interpretation and how courts might apply the change.
