Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Court Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel clears bill clarifying garnishment service fees for sheriffs and servers

Civil Justice Subcommittee · March 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representative Reeves said House Bill 17-98 clarifies that each garnishment is treated as an original service for fee purposes, allowing sheriffs and process servers to collect separate fees and require payment in advance; the measure was sent to full judiciary, 7–0.

Representative Reeves explained House Bill 17-98 would remove uncertainty about whether multiple garnishments in the same case qualify for separate service fees. "The bill established that each garnishment is treated as an original service for fee purposes, and that ensures that sheriffs and authorized process servers are compensated," Reeves said, adding officials may require payment in advance.

Representative Johnson said $40 per service "sounds like a reasonable fee" but questioned whether the administrative work would be heavy for that amount; Reeves replied sheriffs likely agree $40 is not much but they should not be left absorbing multiple services without payment. The subcommittee voted 7–0 to forward HB 17-98 to full judiciary.