Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sawmill Outparcel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission gives concept‑level support for Sawmill Road outparcel but urges changes to setback, parking and utilities
Summary
A concept plan for a roughly 5,500 sq ft outparcel on the Sawmill Road frontage received general support but commissioners urged the applicant to push the building back from Sawmill, address overhead AEP electric lines, consolidate dumpsters/loading, and explore ways to create more walkable corner activation.
Get email alerts on the Sawmill Outparcel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The commission provided nonbinding feedback on a concept plan for a Sawmill Road outparcel (Case 25-089 CP) on Sept. 18, indicating general support for exploring an outparcel but warning that the current concept must be refined to better meet the Bridge Street District vision for walkability and corner articulation.
Phil Moorhead of g2 planning and design described an approximately 5,500‑square‑foot single‑story building on a roughly 0.5‑acre parcel split from a larger 3.65‑acre site. Moorhead said overhead electric lines and minimum parking requirements are constraints; he outlined two parking‑reduction strategies staff suggested — an auto‑share credit and a transit‑proximity credit — that could reduce minimum parking requirements by roughly 10% each depending on applicability.
Staff (Mr. Bator) advised that the concept is consistent with the Bridge Street District vision as an interim step toward future densification but cautioned streetscape and right‑of‑way details remain unresolved, particularly along the Sawmill Road edge where jurisdiction transitions to the city of Columbus. Commissioners asked the applicant to study shifting the building west, consolidating loading and dumpster areas, exploring moving or replacing utility poles with AEP, and considering second‑story options if feasible.
Because the submission was a concept plan, the item was nonaction; the applicant said he heard general support to proceed and would return with more detailed preliminary plans addressing the commission’s concerns.
