Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner objects to public-health vendor over CEO posts; board ratifies contracts after debate
Summary
Commissioner Sylvia asked the board to separate a $30,000 public-health contract with Flourish & Thrive (contract 7202), citing the vendor CEO's public social-media posts and alleged opposition to federal actions; public-health staff said the vendor was highest-rated through RFP. A motion to separate the contract failed and the board approved post-execution ratifications by roll call.
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A disagreement over a Department of Public Health contract briefly held up the board's consent ratification. Commissioner Sylvia (speaker 7) asked that contract 7202—a $30,000 agreement for a public-health surveillance-team evaluation with a vendor called Flourish & Thrive—be pulled from the ratification packet because of social-media activity by the vendor's CEO. "When someone has a public disagreement with our president and is actively working against him, I'm not sure that's an organization we should be partnering with," she said, urging colleagues to vote no on that item.
Public-health staff responded that Flourish & Thrive had been vetted via the county RFP process and had been the highest-rated vendor for the work. A county staff representative (speaker 14) told the board the vendor had gone through procurement and that the work was scheduled for September; she warned that delay could risk losing funds in the current fiscal year. Commissioners debated options—sending the item back to public health, tabling it or accepting staff vetting. A roll-call vote to separate contract 7202 failed; the board then approved the full post-execution ratification list. No formal policy change was adopted during the meeting, but several commissioners said they wanted a future policy review about vendors using county references on their websites or in marketing.
The exchange included concerns about political advocacy, procurement integrity and whether the county should be featured on a vendor website without additional approval. Public-health staff said the vendor had previously been used and scored highly on procurement criteria. Commissioner Rohde said she would vote to send the contract back for review; others said they trusted the procurement process. The ratification motion ultimately passed by roll call.
