Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Astoria staff present feasibility study for Aquatic Center expansion; estimate $6–7 million project
Summary
Parks staff presented a 2023 draft feasibility study for an Astoria Aquatic Center expansion, proposing new indoor gym and fitness space, an estimated $5–6M addition (total project $6–7M), and projected annual revenue rising from about $540,000 to roughly $770,000 if funded and built.
Parks and Recreation Director Jonah Dart McLean presented a 2023 draft feasibility study and preliminary design by Scott Edwards & Associates for expanding the Astoria Aquatic Center. The concept includes a one‑story west addition with a high‑school‑regulation basketball gym (multi‑sport use and community programming) and a smaller east‑side enclosed group‑fitness room. “We see 40 to 50,000 people at the facility every year,” McLean said, noting the center’s regional uses by Coast Guard rescue swimmers, local swim teams and Columbia Memorial Hospital’s therapy program.
Recreation Manager Tyler Lingstad described public‑health and economic benefits and a market analysis that underpins staff projections. "Currently the Astoria Aquatic Center's annual revenue is $540,000," he said, adding that staff and consultants project that expanded programming could raise revenue to about $770,000 annually. McLean summarized a rough order‑of‑magnitude capital estimate: the new expansion elements could cost $5–$6 million, with total project costs potentially between $6–$7 million. Staff recommended pursuing private donations, philanthropic grants and state funding rather than relying solely on the general fund.
Councilors asked detailed questions about staffing, loss of a small outdoor green area, competition with college and school facilities, and fundraising strategy. McLean said current parks staffing includes 15 full‑time employees and that consolidation at the Aquatic Center should increase on‑site efficiency though part‑time help will still be required for programs. No funding decision or formal vote was taken; staff said they would return with refined cost estimates and a fundraising plan if council supports further study.
