Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve 4% COLA for county employees, debate further pay-scale changes and elected-official raises
Summary
After a lengthy debate over retention and compression, the court approved a 4% COLA for full- and part-time county employees and discussed step-and-grade changes for commissioned staff, elected-official salary tiers, and targeted raises for constables and JPs. Several motions carried and some failed; staff reported the projected fund-balance draw for FY26.
Get email alerts on the Personnel Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parker County’s Commissioners Court spent much of its Aug. 25 meeting on employee pay and FY26 salary planning, approving a 4% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for full- and part-time employees and taking multiple additional pay-scale actions.
Budget staff presented cost impacts and committee recommendations. Becky (budget staff) summarized the estimated dollar impacts of different percentage increases: a 4% increase for all staff was estimated to add roughly $1.6 million to salary lines (non-elected). After discussion and compromise motions, the court approved a 4% COLA for full- and part-time employees.
The court also considered a commissioned pay-scale step-and-grade proposal requested by law enforcement leadership. The sheriff’s office presented a 'step-and-grade' compensation plan that would increase commissioned pay; figures offered to the court included a commissioned pay-scale request of $610,619 and non-commission adjustments of $168,150. Commissioners discussed compression and retention tradeoffs; some members described the plan as necessary to keep deputies competitive in the market.
Elected-official pay prompted separate debate. One commissioner moved to keep elected-official salaries flat to 'lead from the front' while bond measures are being presented to voters; that motion failed on a recorded vote. The court later adopted a tiered approach that tied some county-wide officer salaries to appointed-office benchmarks (auditor/purchasing) for specified tenures and advanced constables and justices of the peace to a separate 5% tier intended to address long-standing disparities.
On funding, staff later summarized the combined salary adjustments discussed during the session and the planned use of fund balance: total salary adjustments were estimated at about $2.96 million and the proposed fund-balance draw was about $4.29 million. The court set a timeline to finalize decisions in time for budget adoption on Sept. 22.
Quotes from the meeting reflected competing priorities: one commissioner said, "We're gonna be coming to the voters for a couple of significant bonds ... we should lead from the front," while a budget member emphasized affordability and recommended 3% as reasonable given CPI and budget constraints.
Next steps: staff will incorporate the approved COLA, the step-and-grade decisions that carried, and the elected-official tiers into the draft FY26 budget and return updated fund-balance impacts before the Sept. 22 adoption meeting.
