Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates resolution to curb ‘command intensifiers’ in policing; committee report adverse
Summary
Council considered a resolution asking the administration to examine ways to eliminate disrespectful 'command intensifiers' in policing; after extensive debate about existing policies and oversight progress, the committee's report was recorded as adverse (8–5).
Get email alerts on the Policing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Councilman Garrett introduced a resolution urging the administration to examine ways to eliminate disrespectful 'command intensifiers'—profane or escalatory language used by officers—that community members say undermine trust and de‑escalation. Garrett described instances brought up in town halls and said the resolution seeks conversations and policy changes that do not necessarily cost money but would address repeated community concerns.
Opponents and some colleagues said the city already has policies and ongoing work on use of force and training. Councilwoman Amobian pointed to an existing policy that characterizes such language as unacceptable and noted the independent auditor and oversight processes; Mayor Malek said 18 recommendations from a recent performance (perf) report have already been implemented and that the administration is updating use‑of‑force policy changes and tracking progress.
Garrett and others requested more clarity about enforcement and penalties; Mary Hock (administration) offered to present details and penalties at the next public safety meeting. After discussion the committee's report was recorded as adverse 8–5. Council members emphasized the need for public reporting and follow‑up by the administration and the oversight auditor.

