Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Daycare Capacity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee recommends aligning in‑home daycare zoning with state limit of up to 12 children
Summary
Administrator Rindy told the committee that state licensure will permit up to 12 children in some in‑home daycares starting Aug. 1; the committee voted to forward a zoning text amendment to Common Council so the city’s code will allow the same capacity, pending plan commission review and a Council public hearing.
Get email alerts on the Daycare Capacity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Administrator Rindy told the committee the state has updated licensure to allow larger in‑home daycares and staff proposed changing the city’s zoning definition to match that limit.
“This is Administrator Rindy. … the state is now as of August 1, allowing it to be up to 12 children with certain requirements,” Rindy said, explaining staff’s recommendation to change the local in‑home daycare definition from 4–8 children to up to 12 so it aligns with state rules. Rindy said the change would not alter state licensing requirements — operators still must meet state standards to obtain a license.
A committee member asked whether the local amendment would simply mirror state rules or add different standards. Rindy replied that the local change is intended to permit the use consistent with state licensure but that the state’s separate licensing requirements would still control who may qualify for the license. The Chair suggested drafting language that referenced the state maximum so future state changes would not force repeated local amendments; other members and staff said that approach could require broader revisions (for example, to group‑center provisions) and that the proposed numeric update is the simpler path.
A committee member moved and another seconded to forward the zoning text amendment to the Common Council; the committee voted to send the item to Council. Rindy noted the plan commission will review the item at its Aug. 12 meeting, and if recommended the Council would set a public hearing — likely for its Sept. 1 meeting — before taking final action.
