Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ethics topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council receives ethics training on new state requirements for elected officials

American Fork City Council · April 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Legal Counsel Heather Schriever led a training session outlining the Utah Municipal Ethics Act and new legislation requiring training; she reviewed disclosure thresholds (stocks/bonds over $5,000 and >10% ownership), recusal and gift rules, and read statutory language about improper gifts.

Legal Counsel Heather Schriever presented ethics and conflict-of-interest training to the council as required by recent state legislation.

Schriever reviewed the Utah Municipal Ethics Act framework and detailed disclosure rules, including the requirement to list stock or bond holdings with a fair market value above $5,000 (with exceptions for managed funds, blind trusts and similar vehicles) and the definition of a "substantial interest" (ownership of 10% or more in a business). She explained distinctions between disclosure and recusal, advised officials to disclose potential conflicts as soon as they arise, and said elected officials should consult legal counsel when serving in outside roles that could create a conflict.

At one point Schriever read statutory language to the council: "It's an offense for you as an elected official to knowingly receive, accept, take, seek, or solicit, directly or indirectly From the officer or municipal employee or from another a gift of substantial value or substantial economic benefit, tantamount to a gift that would one tend to improperly influence you or the person knows That it is for the purpose of rewarding you for an official action taken." The training also addressed practical scenarios—such as the mayor serving as Chamber President—illustrating when an official should disclose, recuse, or have the Mayor Pro Tem handle matters to avoid perceived conflicts.

Council members asked specific questions about stock disclosure thresholds, contractor/1099 relationships, and when disclosure is required if a related transaction arises shortly before a meeting. Schriever advised written disclosures when required, and reiterated that ethics violations can carry criminal penalties.