Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nutrition Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill to require added-sugar warning icons on chain menus advances after split testimony
Summary
SB 869 would require large chain restaurants to display a clear added-sugar warning icon and statement for single-serve beverages that exceed a high added-sugar threshold; health groups supported it, restaurants raised cost and implementation concerns.
Senator Weber Pearson described SB 869 as a targeted transparency measure that places a prominent added-sugar icon on menus for beverages that meet or exceed the daily recommended added-sugar level. "This bill is to inform consumers about added sugars," she told the committee, noting the amendment that raised the beverage threshold to 50 grams of added sugar to reduce overreach.
Student advocate Sarah Bauchter (American Heart Association volunteer) testified that conspicuous icons at the point of purchase matter because customers do not scan QR codes when ordering; Christine Falaboe of the American Diabetes Association testified that a single sugary drink daily increases type 2 diabetes risk. Opponents led by the California Restaurant Association said the mandate is costly, burdensome on menu real estate and potentially redundant with existing nutrition labeling. Committee members asked technical questions about QR codes and implementation; the bill was moved as amended for later appropriations consideration.
